From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: When will vacuum go away? |
Date: | 2001-10-19 01:25:19 |
Message-ID: | 3BCF80FF.8000603@selectacast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
BTW will there be a 7.1.4 release before 7.2 comes out so we can dump our databases to
upgrade to 7.2 w/o there being 60 in the seconds field?
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Michael Richards" <michael(at)fastmail(dot)ca> writes:
>
>>I've been watching for this for some time. First it was 7.0, then
>>7.1. Does anyone have any idea on when the row re-use code will be
>>ready?
>>
>
> VACUUM isn't disappearing any time soon, but 7.2's version of vacuum
> runs in parallel with normal transactions, so it's not so painful to
> run it frequently. See discussion in development docs,
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/maintenance.html
>
>
>>Given trouble with Great Bridge is there any info out there on when
>>7.2 might hit the streets?
>>
>
> The last several postponements of 7.2 beta have *not* been the fault
> of the ex-GreatBridge folks around here.
>
> You can find a snapshot that should be pretty durn close to 7.2beta1
> at ftp://ftp2.us.postgresql.org/pub/dev/postgresql-snapshot.tar.gz
> (note that at last word, other mirrors were not up to date --- if
> the doc/TODO file doesn't contain a date in October, it's stale).
> I think the only thing we're still waiting on is some datetime fixes
> from Tom Lockhart...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-19 01:26:17 | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-19 01:12:10 | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-19 01:30:56 | Re: When will vacuum go away? |
Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2001-10-19 00:25:44 | index question |