| From: | Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Warnock <david(at)sundayta(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| Date: | 1999-07-05 18:15:12 |
| Message-ID: | 8968.990705@udmnet.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hello David,
Monday, July 05, 1999 you wrote:
D> I have just been thinking a bit more and have realised that the
D> multi-generational architecture of 6.5 (which I have used in Interbase)
D> means that probably both clustering (in thr dynamic sense) and full
D> record number support as request by Leon are impractical.
D> It seems to me that record number relationships will fail completely if
D> there can be more than one version of a record.
Maybe it is a silly question, but what are "more than one version
of a record"? In my opinion record is a atomic unique entity.
Isn't it?
D> (well even if they are
D> forced to work they will lose some/all of their speed advantage).
Best regards, Leon
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kane Tao | 1999-07-05 18:28:11 | Re: Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| Previous Message | Leon | 1999-07-05 18:12:39 | Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Clark Evans | 1999-07-05 18:36:20 | Re: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| Previous Message | Leon | 1999-07-05 18:12:39 | Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |