| From: | Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Warnock <david(at)sundayta(dot)co(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| Date: | 1999-07-05 18:12:39 |
| Message-ID: | 2967.990705@udmnet.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hello Bruce,
Monday, July 05, 1999 you wrote:
>> I have just been thinking a bit more and have realised that the
>> multi-generational architecture of 6.5 (which I have used in Interbase)
>> means that probably both clustering (in thr dynamic sense) and full
>> record number support as request by Leon are impractical.
B> Yes, would be a big problem. Most commercial databases have found that
B> the network data model is impractical in most cases.
That's exacly why such powerful tool as SQL is incomparably slower
than plain dbf in most cases. Ignoring network data model was
a big mistake.
Best regards, Leon
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Leon | 1999-07-05 18:15:12 | Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-05 18:00:12 | Re: Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Leon | 1999-07-05 18:15:12 | Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| Previous Message | Leon | 1999-07-05 18:09:40 | Re[2]: [HACKERS] Fwd: Joins and links |