Re: More Praise for 7.4RC2

From: jake(at)omnimode(dot)com (jake johnson)
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More Praise for 7.4RC2
Date: 2003-11-12 17:04:59
Message-ID: 8897a0de.0311120904.1d10900f@posting.google.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

reece(at)in-machina(dot)com (Reece Hart) wrote in message news:<1068597494(dot)28850(dot)266(dot)camel(at)tallac>...
[...snip...]
> The cost estimates give the right qualitative feel. 7.3.4 took >30
> minutes for this query whereas 7.4RC2 responds essentially
> instantaneously.
>
[...snip...]

I also posted about the performance increase of 7.4, but I think that
much of the difference you're seeing (because it's such a large
difference) is probably due to the cleanliness of a newly restored
database from backup. Perhaps a vacuum analyze could have improved
that 30+ minute response time on 7.3.4.

I too posted about the performance improvement, seeing about 200% at
first after restoring from backup. After some transactions, however,
I'd say its more like 100% - 125% improvement. I'm still particularly
impressed with the improvement in the select count(*) query
performance, which is about 100% improved.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajesh Kumar Mallah 2003-11-12 17:13:11 procpid in pg_stat_activity but no correspoding backend
Previous Message Jordan Henderson 2003-11-12 16:34:14 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system