Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, "NikhilS" <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Docs" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: 2007-11-29 17:08:29
Message-ID: 87zlwxj7xu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-patches


"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> A trigger will probably beat a rule for inserts/updates involving a small
>> number of rows.
>
> Which is exactly what partitioning is doing.

Say what?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-29 17:12:55 Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-29 16:49:11 Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-29 17:12:55 Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-29 16:49:11 Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules