From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Date: | 2007-11-29 17:12:55 |
Message-ID: | 15647.1196356375@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> A trigger
>> will probably beat a rule for inserts/updates involving a small number
>> of rows.
> Which is exactly what partitioning is doing.
Nonsense. Well, maybe *you* never do that, but if so you are hardly
reflective of the whole world.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-29 17:13:59 | Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-29 17:08:29 | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-29 17:13:59 | Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-29 17:08:29 | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |