From: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Carlo Stonebanks <carlo(at)stonebanks(dot)ca> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sequence names have 64 character limit? |
Date: | 2011-03-31 21:13:11 |
Message-ID: | 87y63vm1so.fsf@comcast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Carlo Stonebanks <carlo(at)stonebanks(dot)ca> writes:
> Whenever I attempt to create a sequence whether this is done directly
> via CREATE SEQUENCE or indrirectly vial declaring a column as SERIAL,
> PG truncates it to 64 characters. Is this a documented limitation? I
> cant find a reference to it. Is it possible to change this
> limitation?
See the "name" data type.
As for enlarging it; I'll bet yes but you'll have to compile from source
to do this.
Someone on the hackers list can better explain :-)
> Our table names are and fully descriptive, and our code depends on a
> predictable sequence naming convention of the PG default
> <table>_<column>_seq.
>
> Yes, I know that its not a great idea to depend on consistent naming
> conventions!
>
> Carlo
>
--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 305.321.1144
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-03-31 21:29:20 | Re: Sequence names have 64 character limit? |
Previous Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2011-03-31 20:22:56 | Re: Access to NEW.column outside of a trigger function. |