From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> |
Cc: | Carlo Stonebanks <carlo(at)stonebanks(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sequence names have 64 character limit? |
Date: | 2011-03-31 21:29:20 |
Message-ID: | 4D94F230.6040608@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 03/31/2011 02:13 PM, Jerry Sievers wrote:
> Carlo Stonebanks<carlo(at)stonebanks(dot)ca> writes:
>
>> Whenever I attempt to create a sequence whether this is done directly
>> via CREATE SEQUENCE or indrirectly vial declaring a column as SERIAL,
>> PG truncates it to 64 characters. Is this a documented limitation? I
>> cant find a reference to it. Is it possible to change this
>> limitation?
>
> See the "name" data type.
>
> As for enlarging it; I'll bet yes but you'll have to compile from source
> to do this.
>
> Someone on the hackers list can better explain :-)
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/sql-syntax-lexical.html
4.1.1. Identifiers and Key Words
>
>> Our table names are and fully descriptive, and our code depends on a
>> predictable sequence naming convention of the PG default
>> <table>_<column>_seq.
>>
>> Yes, I know that its not a great idea to depend on consistent naming
>> conventions!
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlo Stonebanks | 2011-03-31 21:47:26 | Re: Sequence names have 64 character limit? |
Previous Message | Jerry Sievers | 2011-03-31 21:13:11 | Re: Sequence names have 64 character limit? |