From: | Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Colin Faber <cfaber(at)fpsn(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |
Date: | 2002-02-26 19:00:02 |
Message-ID: | 87wux0nk5p.fsf@npa01zz001.simplot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> ...
>
> Agreed.
>
> > For PostgreSQL to achieve its real potential, the game must be played.
>
> Hmm. Would "PostgreSQL version (Oracle + 1)i" be too transparent? ;)
>
> - Thomas
I think that it makes better sense than PostgreSQL XP. Whatever
"marketing" you guys plan to do make sure you mix in a vowel or two.
Personally I would promote the idea of going "all out" and naming the
new version of PostgreSQL something like:
PostgreSQL 2002i XP Anywhere eDatabase-O-Matic.NET
This might require a change in the MP3 pronunciation file, and you
probably wouldn't want to make the name change official until you
bumped up the maximum column length.
Jason
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-02-26 19:19:17 | Re: Refactoring of command.c |
Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2002-02-26 18:28:17 | Please, apply patch for contrib/tsearch |