Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??

From: Colin Faber <cfaber(at)fpsn(dot)net>
To: Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??
Date: 2002-02-26 20:40:21
Message-ID: 3C7BF2B4.43FE9C63@fpsn.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

haha.

I love it jason,

"PostgreSQL 2002i XP Anywhere eDatabase-O-Matic.NET"

"For those of you that need to harness distributed interfaces, engineer
world-class architectures and synthesize cross-media experiences for the
expedition of your integrated communities"

Jason Earl wrote:
>
> Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
>
> > ...
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > > For PostgreSQL to achieve its real potential, the game must be played.
> >
> > Hmm. Would "PostgreSQL version (Oracle + 1)i" be too transparent? ;)
> >
> > - Thomas
>
> I think that it makes better sense than PostgreSQL XP. Whatever
> "marketing" you guys plan to do make sure you mix in a vowel or two.
>
> Personally I would promote the idea of going "all out" and naming the
> new version of PostgreSQL something like:
>
> PostgreSQL 2002i XP Anywhere eDatabase-O-Matic.NET
>
> This might require a change in the MP3 pronunciation file, and you
> probably wouldn't want to make the name change official until you
> bumped up the maximum column length.
>
> Jason
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Colin Faber
(303) 859-1491
fpsn.net, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-02-26 21:27:43 Re: COPY incorrectly uses null instead of an empty string
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-02-26 20:37:39 Rename sequence bug/feature