From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Table versions |
Date: | 2003-10-29 17:45:35 |
Message-ID: | 87wuaoey4g.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Returning to the original problem, it seems to me that comparing "pg_dump
> -s" output is a reasonable way to proceed.
I've actually started checking in a pg_dump -s output file into my CVS tree.
However I prune a few key lines from it. I prune the TOC OID numbers from it,
and anything not owned by the user I'm interested in.
The makefile rule I use looks like:
schema.sql:
pg_dump -U postgres -s user | sed '/^-- TOC entry/d;/^\\connect - postgres/,/^\\connect - user/d;/^SET search_path/d;/^$$/d;/^--$$/d' > $@
This still suffers from one major deficiency. The order that objects are
outputed isn't necessarily consistent between databases. If I add tables to
the development server but then add them to the production server in a
different order the schema still shows differences even though the objects in
the two databases are identical.
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-29 17:49:40 | Re: [SQL] Table versions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-29 17:24:33 | Re: pg_clog & vacuum oddness |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-29 17:49:40 | Re: [SQL] Table versions |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-29 17:42:57 | Re: Help on update that subselects other records in table, uses joins |