From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Table versions |
Date: | 2003-10-29 17:49:40 |
Message-ID: | 15525.1067449780@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-sql |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> This still suffers from one major deficiency. The order that objects are
> outputed isn't necessarily consistent between databases. If I add tables to
> the development server but then add them to the production server in a
> different order the schema still shows differences even though the objects in
> the two databases are identical.
Yeah. Stef may be able to handle this by comparing single-table dumps
rather than an overall pg_dump. In the long run pg_dump's logic for
ordering objects needs a wholesale rewrite --- maybe that will happen
for 7.5.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-10-29 17:57:17 | Re: pg_clog & vacuum oddness |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-10-29 17:45:35 | Re: [SQL] Table versions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bryan Encina | 2003-10-29 17:53:52 | Re: Help on update that subselects other records in table, uses joins |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-10-29 17:45:35 | Re: [SQL] Table versions |