From: | Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Views- Advantages and Disadvantages |
Date: | 2007-05-11 03:32:39 |
Message-ID: | 87vef0c9wo.fsf@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> On 05/10/07 21:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Leif B. Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org> writes:
>>> Would it be reasonable to suggest that later versions of PostgreSQL
>>> could examine if a function changes data, and quietly marks a function
>>> as 'stable' if it doesn't?
>>
>> My instinctive CS-major reply to that is "only if you've found a
>> solution to the halting problem". However, it's possible that we could
>> detect this case for a useful subset of real-world functions ... not
>> sure offhand what could be covered.
>
> If there are no INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE statements in the function?
And all functions called from inside the one being run as well
(recursive condition, of course)...
--
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-05-11 04:08:10 | Re: Views- Advantages and Disadvantages |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-11 03:21:30 | Re: Views- Advantages and Disadvantages |