| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Views- Advantages and Disadvantages |
| Date: | 2007-05-11 02:49:38 |
| Message-ID: | 4643D9C2.80601@cox.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/07 21:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Leif B. Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org> writes:
>> Would it be reasonable to suggest that later versions of PostgreSQL
>> could examine if a function changes data, and quietly marks a function
>> as 'stable' if it doesn't?
>
> My instinctive CS-major reply to that is "only if you've found a
> solution to the halting problem". However, it's possible that we could
> detect this case for a useful subset of real-world functions ... not
> sure offhand what could be covered.
If there are no INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE statements in the function?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGQ9nCS9HxQb37XmcRAuxyAJ9Setk7j5/xg5jwvNi3o6RDceuGLACg1FDS
LptxOrJvoNVSjEATWIeFo+Y=
=5MT8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-05-11 02:58:01 | Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-11 02:39:08 | Re: Missing magic block |