From: | Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Date: | 2006-05-18 05:18:53 |
Message-ID: | 87u07nuczm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
* Mark Woodward:
> "On the other hand, you shouldn't use mysql_use_result() if you are doing
> a lot of processing for each row on the client side, or if the output is
> sent to a screen on which the user may type a ^S (stop scroll). This ties
> up the server and prevent other threads from updating any tables from
> which the data is being fetched."
>
> How do busy web sites work like this?
Any system based on locking exhibits this problem. Even with MVCC,
you can run into it if you've got multiple writers. As a rule of
thumb, I never perform network I/O within transactions which update
the database (or "read the database", for systems without MVCC).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-05-18 09:10:51 | Re: at JavaOne ... is anyone else? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-05-18 04:18:38 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] One line new items |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Weimer | 2006-05-18 05:21:17 | Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-18 04:45:11 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |