[OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-18 00:08:08
Message-ID: 18924.24.91.171.78.1147910888.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Sorry to interrupt, but I have had the "opportinuty" to have to work with
MySQL. This nice little gem is packed away in the reference for
mysql_use_result().

"On the other hand, you shouldn't use mysql_use_result() if you are doing
a lot of processing for each row on the client side, or if the output is
sent to a screen on which the user may type a ^S (stop scroll). This ties
up the server and prevent other threads from updating any tables from
which the data is being fetched."

How do busy web sites work like this?

What is the best way to go about creating a "plug and play," PostgreSQL
replacement for MySQL? I think the biggest problem getting PostgreSQL
accepted is that so much code is available for MySQL.

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-18 00:47:40 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-17 21:59:40 Re: at JavaOne ... is anyone else?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-05-18 00:17:26 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-18 00:05:02 pgsql: Add simplified sparc8 ASM for solaris_sparc.s, from Alan Stange.