From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: September Commit Fest coming soon! |
Date: | 2008-08-28 15:02:03 |
Message-ID: | 87r689qj2s.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> writes:
>> At 2008-08-28 20:09:21 +0900, umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>>> For the git hosted projects, should we send in the latest patch file
>>> to this list?
>
>> Yes, please do that.
>
> Yes. You should *not* assume that reviewers are going to look at the
> git repository.
I think we should include both. They serve two different purposes. The GIT
repository might disappear some day or be inaccessible for some users. Also
you might be asking for commentary on specific questions about that specific
snapshot.
However when a committer is actually looking to commit the code he'll want to
be sure he has the most recent snapshot including any later changes that might
not have warranted an email.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-08-28 15:03:08 | Re: code coverage patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-28 14:54:11 | Re: September Commit Fest coming soon! |