| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: September Commit Fest coming soon! |
| Date: | 2008-08-28 15:13:33 |
| Message-ID: | 10988.1219936413@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Yes. You should *not* assume that reviewers are going to look at the
>> git repository.
> However when a committer is actually looking to commit the code he'll want to
> be sure he has the most recent snapshot including any later changes that might
> not have warranted an email.
I'm going to state for the record that I have no intention of digging
around in unofficial repositories for unsubmitted changes (that might
or might not have been intended to go in anyway). If you don't like
what I commit, send a delta patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-08-28 15:53:41 | Re: Proposal to sync SET ROLE and pg_stat_activity |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-28 15:09:51 | Re: code coverage patch |