From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/PgSQL buglet / doc error |
Date: | 2002-11-08 00:10:41 |
Message-ID: | 87n0ok7wfy.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> On 7 Nov 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> > If you have declared the function to return void, then the expression
> > can be omitted, and will be ignored in any case.
>
> I'm not sure how you translated the above to return is optional. I'd
> read it as the expression portion of the return statement is optional if
> the function returns void. Thus you can say return; for the return
> because the expression is optional.
Woops :-)
There might be a case to be made for actually implementing this (not
requiring a blank RETURN at the end of a function body if the function
doesn't return anything), but the original "bug" is obviously a case
of my misreading the docs.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-11-08 00:16:18 | Re: Outstanding patches |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-11-08 00:03:01 | Re: PL/PgSQL buglet / doc error |