| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Outstanding patches |
| Date: | 2002-11-08 00:16:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3DCB0252.8030602@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>I concur, but do we have some sort of commitment that the rest of
>>the SQL200x sequence machinery will be supported eventually? Otherwise,
>>adding some irrelevant syntax variations in limited places doesn't seem
>>fruitful.
> Yes, I'll implement the rest of the SQL200x sequence stuff
> eventually. However, if you'd rather wait for me to finish it all and
> then commit it at that point, that's fine with me.
I'd suggest contributing what you have now. Waiting just keeps others
from contributing to the topic (which is not your intention certainly,
but it would have that effect).
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-08 00:24:41 | Re: Outstanding patches |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-08 00:10:41 | Re: PL/PgSQL buglet / doc error |