From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Date: | 2007-08-04 16:48:58 |
Message-ID: | 87lkcrkzyd.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> Not sure what your definition of normal is; that depends on what you mean by
> "registered". If it means just creating an account via web form, that's
> harldy an impediment to vandalism. We can certainly give more people the power
> to grant write-access to wiki accounts, if that's the perceived hold up.
Do we have any history of vandalism on the -hackers mailing list? There is no
approval mechanism for people subscribing to the list. Would people be happy
if every subscription to -hackers required someone to approve your membership?
I went to do update the wiki recently, found I didn't have write access and
gave up and went back to other things. I think any extra barriers are a bad
thing. It ought to be open until there's a demonstrable problem rather than
preemptively making it less useful because we anticipate problems we have no
evidence of.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-04 16:56:32 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-04 16:44:57 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-04 16:56:32 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-04 16:44:57 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |