From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Date: | 2007-08-04 16:56:32 |
Message-ID: | 46B4AFC0.2030403@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave Page wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:56, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> I don't see any need to have any public facing pages on a Wiki - are we
> too lazy to write things up for the website when we want to present them
> to the world? It's not like it's difficult to do.
Yes, in fact it is. It is a complete pain in the butt in comparison to
editing a wiki. If I want a page added to the .Org I have to:
A. Understand CVS
B. Understand HTML
C. Understand patch
Worse, if I want to test my changes:
A. Understand apache
B. Understand mod_rewrite
C. Install and configure PHP
D. Figure out how everything is laid out in the htdocs structure for pgweb
Now, *I* understand all these things (except mod_rewrite). I *can*
contribute to the website and have.
*I* and nobody else in this community should have to go through that
much effort to add a page.
As a comparison for CMDs website:
(if the page exists)
A. Login
B. Edit page
C. Review changes
D. Save changes
(if the page doesn't exist)
A. Login
B. Insert new row into pages and site_items table
C. Edit page
D. Review changes
E. Save changes
The only time anyone has to do any type of coding is if we want a new
feature such as my blog.
Compare to a wiki:
A. Login
B. Make change
C. Review change
D. Save change
Now that I have written all of this. I am not suggesting that we change
our web infrastructure. I am however suggesting that we stop insulting
people and looking very arrogant about our, "It isn't like it is that
hard", because it is indeed hard and much harder than it should be.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> For collaboration work however, the Wiki is important I think - but I
> agree with Greg, we shouldn't need a second one. Can't we have an area
> on the current one with looser permissions?
>
> /D
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGtK/AATb/zqfZUUQRAhllAJ9h+B5K2AWAmnHzCcmnh9j9QwgvjwCfcYqb
xBYMwCTHAhnrFgca8e06MKI=
=Oata
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-04 16:57:25 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-08-04 16:48:58 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-04 16:57:25 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-08-04 16:48:58 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |