Re: plpgsql Difference in behaviour between versions?

From: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql(dot)general(at)googlegroups(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql Difference in behaviour between versions?
Date: 2011-11-23 21:42:58
Message-ID: 87fwhe7bx9.fsf@comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Chris McDonald <chrisjonmcdonald(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> Hi, I am upgrading a system from postgresql 8.4.8 (fedora 13 x64) to
> postgresql 9.0.5 (fedora 15 x64). As I build a database I've noticed
> that the following works on 8.4.8 but does not work on 9.0.5. Can
> someone tell me why this is not legal syntax in 9.0.5 but is legal
> in 8.4.8 please:
>
> ===snip===
> create type mytype
> as
> (
> somekey integer,
> open numeric(14, 2)
> );
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myfunc(IN INTEGER, IN NUMERIC(14, 2))
> RETURNS VOID
> AS $$
> DECLARE
> somekey ALIAS FOR $1;
> rec mytype;
> BEGIN
> rec.somekey = somekey;
>
> -- 9.0.5 will fail at the dot character in the
> -- following line here with syntax error sqlstate 42601
> -- but 8.4.8 is happy.
> rec."open" = 32;

Hmmm, I do not see that open is a reserved word but the PL must be
treating it special somehow.

See where I've added quotes above which gets it working on my 9.1
instance.

HTH

> -- ^
>
> RETURN;
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
> ===snip===
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 305.321.1144

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-23 21:44:52 Re: Compiler does not detect support for 64 bit integers
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-11-23 21:35:33 Re: plpgsql Difference in behaviour between versions?