Re: Postgres unique index checking and atomic transactions

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres unique index checking and atomic transactions
Date: 2003-07-24 17:30:28
Message-ID: 87el0fq1cb.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> writes:

> The good news though is that, if you drop (or disable) your pk index

That's what I did, except I had to cascade to the foreign keys and then
recreate them too. And you can't really recreate a primary key constraint, you
just get a unique index which I think is equivalent.

And that's another wishlist item. It would be nice to be able to disable
constraints without dropping them and without poking around in catalog tables
manually.

Ie, it would be nice to be able to do

alter table foo disable constraint "$1"

and then later do

alter table foo enable constraint "$1"

and have postgres optionally recheck the constraint or not. It would be a lot
safer than potentially accidentally recreating the constraint incorrectly. And
a lot safer than poking around in the catalog tables.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vernon Smith 2003-07-24 17:44:39 Re: SAP DB: The unsung Open Source DB
Previous Message Dmitry Tkach 2003-07-24 17:00:42 Re: Postgres unique index checking and atomic transactions