| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour |
| Date: | 2003-02-05 23:32:46 |
| Message-ID: | 87d6m6482p.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 15:49, Greg Stark wrote:
> > % cumulative self self total
> > time seconds seconds calls s/call s/call name
> > 16.59 97.88 97.88 69608411 0.00 0.00 ExecMakeFunctionResult
> > 7.08 139.65 41.77 79472258 0.00 0.00 comparetup_heap
> > 4.50 166.17 26.52 192211935 0.00 0.00 ExecEvalExpr
>
> (Semi OT)
>
> Annoyingly enough, I get similarly strange gprof output (all zeros in
> the two right hand columns) on Debian -- PostgreSQL compiled with
> -DLINUX_PROFILE -pg using gcc 3.2.2pre, glibc 2.3.1, binutils
> 2.13.90.0.16. I haven't been able to figure out what the problem is,
> though.
>
> If anyone has any suggestions on how to fix this, please speak up.
Well this is Debian also, but I don't think that's related. Those two columns
are "seconds per call". Look at how many calls those functions have, they take
very little time per call, much less than 1/100th of a second.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2003-02-06 00:13:54 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.3.2 Released |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-02-05 22:54:49 | Re: IN() alternatives |