From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: IN() alternatives |
Date: | 2003-02-05 22:54:49 |
Message-ID: | 20030205175449.P19037@mail.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:02:53PM -0800, John Smith wrote:
>
> I thought I saw a doc somewhere showing alternatives to using IN() for better performance, but can't find it :(. Are there better performing query alternatives to this?
>
> delete from tab1 where id in (select id2 from tab2 where ...);
Depending on what you're doing, postgres has an extension of SQL
DELETE FROM tab1 WHERE id=tab2.id2 AND tab2.somefield [some
condition].
At least, this has worked for me.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-02-05 23:32:46 | Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour |
Previous Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2003-02-05 22:18:56 | Re: IN() alternatives |