From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Date: | 2005-10-01 16:01:29 |
Message-ID: | 8798.1128182489@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> That was my thinking. The issue has probably been there since 7.3. I don't
> think we need to shove in a solution now, especially when there is so much
> disagreement about the behavior.
Well, we have a new issue that has made the problem much worse (ie ALTER
SCHEMA RENAME), and these problems are not going to get any easier to
solve later. I think we should agree on something and do it.
Ripping out ALTER SCHEMA RENAME is not a solution unless you have a path
to a solution later with more work. So far there has been nothing in
the way of "here is a proposal that will work but it'll take too much
time to implement for 8.1". Eventually we are going to have to settle
on one of the lesser evils, so why not now?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-10-01 16:11:20 | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-01 15:59:24 | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-01 16:12:09 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-01 15:55:12 | Re: Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |