From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ilia Kantor <ilia(at)obnovlenie(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
Date: | 2005-10-01 15:59:24 |
Message-ID: | 20051001155924.GD40138@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:13:09PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:30:10PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:25:46PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Include the Discriminator as a column in A and it will be inherited by
> > > all A1, A2, A3.
> > > e.g. concrete_class char(1) not null
> > <snip>
> > > This will add 1 byte per row in your superclass... and requires no
> >
> > I thought char was actually stored variable-length...? I know there's a
> > type that actually acts like char does on most databases, but I can't
> > remember what it is off-hand (it should be mentioned in docs 8.3...)
>
> IIRC, this is the difference between "char" and char(1). The latter is
> variable length and can store any character per current encoding, hence
> the variable length. "char" on the other hand is a one byte (presumably
> ASCII) character. It's used mainly in the system catalogs...
According to the docs, char == char(1).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-01 16:01:29 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-01 15:58:47 | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |