Re: [Patch]: Documentation of ALTER TABLE re column type changes on binary-coercible fields

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Mike Lissner <mlissner(at)michaeljaylissner(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Patch]: Documentation of ALTER TABLE re column type changes on binary-coercible fields
Date: 2020-01-28 19:51:22
Message-ID: 87943878-3C6E-43AE-AFCF-31E61CF67C91@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 28, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Mike Lissner <mlissner(at)michaeljaylissner(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi all, I didn't get any replies to this. Is this the right way to send in a patch to the docs?
>

Yes, your patch has been received, thanks. I don’t know if anybody is reviewing it, but typically you don’t hear back on a patch until somebody has reviewed it and has an opinion to share with you.

The feeling, “Hey, I submitted something, and for all I know it got lost in the mail” is perhaps common for first time submitters. We’d like to see you around the project again, so please don’t take the silence as a cold shoulder.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-01-28 20:08:39 Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-01-28 19:37:50 Re: Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() to accept localized names