| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE TABLE docs fix |
| Date: | 2002-09-01 17:28:35 |
| Message-ID: | 878z2lwrek.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 04:00, Neil Conway wrote:
> > This patch fixes a minor inaccuracy in the documentation: NOT NULL
> > is not synonymous with CHECK (xxx IS NOT NULL) -- for example,
> > consider ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY, which checks for 'NOT NULL',
> > not a check constraint.
>
> Yeah, but they're still synonymous.
How so? Their behavior is clearly different (note the case above, as
well as any other situation in which the system attempts to determine
if a column allows a NULL value).
Since they are not interchangeable, they can't be synonyms.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-09-01 17:44:37 | Re: CREATE TABLE docs fix |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-01 16:32:24 | Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions |