| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions |
| Date: | 2002-09-01 16:32:24 |
| Message-ID: | 29715.1030897944@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Okay, here's a patch that implements this -- no additional changes to
> PL/PgSQL were needed, as far as I could tell. I've added some
> regression tests that cover this new functionality and they seem to
> work as expected.
Patch applied, with a couple minor documentation/comment fixes.
At this point I believe we have full table function support (return
a tuple, return a set, return RECORD) for SQL and plpgsql functions.
That seems like a clean stopping point for 7.3. But there's no
support at all for these features in pltcl, plperl, or plpython.
Bruce, would you add a TODO item?
* Add table function support to pltcl, plperl, plpython
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-09-01 17:28:35 | Re: CREATE TABLE docs fix |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-01 14:40:26 | Re: CLUSTER all tables |