Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure
Date: 2001-12-20 15:42:41
Message-ID: 8771.1008862961@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What packaging of tcl/tk did you use?

> Latest unstable GNU/Linux Debian. Tcl 8.3.3-1, Tk 8.3.3-1.

I think the Debian packager blew it.

I just looked at a Red Hat 7.2 machine, and it has both tclConfig.sh
and tkConfig.sh in /usr/lib.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Bell 2001-12-20 16:55:56 Re: long ints use for 4-byte entities in ODBC
Previous Message Karel Zak 2001-12-20 15:36:18 Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure