Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure
Date: 2001-12-20 15:36:18
Message-ID: 20011220163618.A20551@zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> writes:

> However, on my machine both tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh are in
> /usr/local/lib, not in the subdirectories. Putting them in
> version-specific subdirectories seems pretty self-defeating.
> What packaging of tcl/tk did you use?

Latest unstable GNU/Linux Debian. Tcl 8.3.3-1, Tk 8.3.3-1.

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-20 15:42:41 Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-20 15:20:34 Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure