Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> > Would that mean I wouldn't be able to change the logging level on the fly at
> > all?
>
> I would think you'd still be able to do it through a security definer
> wrapper function owned by a superuser.
Oh yeah, well that would be sufficient for my purposes.
I must say I thought the behaviour of being able to raise but not lower
logging levels beyond what the system had set was pretty slick when I first
found out about it. But it's not the most important thing in the world, as
long as there's an escape hatch.
--
greg