From: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Jargon and acronyms on this mailing list |
Date: | 2024-09-02 11:06:18 |
Message-ID: | 875xreco2d.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I normally wouldn't mention my blog entries here, but this one was about
> the hackers mailing list, so wanted to let people know about it in case you
> don't follow Planet Postgres. I scanned the last year's worth of posts and
> gathered the most used acronyms and jargon. The most commonly used acronym
> was IMO (in my opinion), followed by FWIW (for what it's worth), and IIUC
> (if I understand correctly). The complete list can be found in the post
> below, I'll refrain from copying everything here.
>
> https://www.crunchydata.com/blog/understanding-the-postgres-hackers-mailing-list
Nice write-up! Might it also be worth linking to the acronyms and
glossary sections of the docs?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/acronyms.html
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/glossary.html
> Cheers,
> Greg
- ilmari
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2024-09-02 11:31:55 | Re: Avoiding superfluous buffer locking during nbtree backwards scans |
Previous Message | Tender Wang | 2024-09-02 10:33:18 | Re: not null constraints, again |