| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] libpq error codes |
| Date: | 2000-06-22 15:17:35 |
| Message-ID: | 8755.961687055@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> writes:
> db=> select count(*) from pg_class;
> pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
> This probably means the backend terminated abnormally
> before or while processing the request.
> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
> !>
> Looks much more reasonable. But I do not get messages about shutdown.
> With a patch enclosed it will perform like with ECONNRESET.
> Shouldn't I emulate EOF when EPIPE?
You *are* emulating EOF --- with that check in place, pqReadData
should respond to EPIPE just like it does to a normal EOF. I don't
understand why you aren't seeing the same results I do.
How exactly are you testing this? I'm doing it with a plain "kill"
on the connected backend process. If you were using "kill -9"
or some such, that'd explain it --- the backend doesn't have an
opportunity to send the "I'm shutting down" message in that case.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-06-22 15:40:40 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] libpq error codes |
| Previous Message | Robert D. Nelson | 2000-06-22 12:05:00 | RE: Postgres with php3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-22 15:27:30 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-22 14:35:19 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |