From: | Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] libpq error codes |
Date: | 2000-06-22 15:40:40 |
Message-ID: | 0006222257170C.00479@dyp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
> > db=> select count(*) from pg_class;
> > pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
> > This probably means the backend terminated abnormally
> > before or while processing the request.
> > The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
> > !>
>
> > Looks much more reasonable. But I do not get messages about shutdown.
> > With a patch enclosed it will perform like with ECONNRESET.
> > Shouldn't I emulate EOF when EPIPE?
>
> You *are* emulating EOF --- with that check in place, pqReadData
> should respond to EPIPE just like it does to a normal EOF. I don't
> understand why you aren't seeing the same results I do.
Hmmm... Looks like I get EPIPE just after connection reset, but you are able
to read the rest of the data... Looks like Linux kernel problem again...
> How exactly are you testing this? I'm doing it with a plain "kill"
> on the connected backend process. If you were using "kill -9"
> or some such, that'd explain it --- the backend doesn't have an
> opportunity to send the "I'm shutting down" message in that case.
kill -TERM for sure.
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp(at)perchine(dot)com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stuart Grimshaw | 2000-06-22 16:16:29 | PHP Install with Postgres support. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-22 15:17:35 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] libpq error codes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-22 20:11:56 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-22 15:27:30 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |