Re: Google SoC--Idea Request

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Date: 2006-04-25 02:36:31
Message-ID: 8743.1145932591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> Where do we stand with getting much more reasonable default values in
> postgresql.conf? Maybe that should be a SoC project, or is it too small?

Define "much more reasonable".

I doubt this is SoC material, simply because the issues have little to
do with coding and a lot to do with persuading people to drop default
support for old platforms. Which is not something a student is likely
to succeed at.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-04-25 02:56:14 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-04-25 01:37:44 Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports