Re: Google SoC--Idea Request

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "John DeSoi" <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Date: 2006-04-25 02:56:14
Message-ID: 36e682920604241956s2bdd8880q2c479740d893c6fd@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/24/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I doubt this is SoC material, simply because the issues have little to
> do with coding and a lot to do with persuading people to drop default
> support for old platforms. Which is not something a student is likely
> to succeed at.

While the student could do some benchmarking on relatively new
hardware and make suggestions, I agree with Tom. Having to keep
support for older platforms doesn't leave much flexibility to change
the defaults.

I just don't see enough work here to warrant a SoC project.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wes 2006-04-25 02:58:34 Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-25 02:36:31 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request