| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PROVE_FLAGS |
| Date: | 2017-05-03 21:02:33 |
| Message-ID: | 8700.1493845353@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Can someone please explain to me why we have this in Makefile.global.in?
> (from commit e9c81b60 )
> PROVE_FLAGS =
Before that commit it was like
PROVE_FLAGS = --verbose
which had some value. I agree that now we'd be better off to not
set it at all, especially since the convention now appears to be that
automatically-supplied prove options should be set in PG_PROVE_FLAGS.
I'd suggest that the comment just above be replaced by something like
# User-supplied prove flags can be provided in PROVE_FLAGS.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-05-03 21:23:11 | Re: CTE inlining |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-05-03 21:00:29 | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |