From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PROVE_FLAGS |
Date: | 2017-05-04 04:50:16 |
Message-ID: | 20170504045015.GF21223@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Can someone please explain to me why we have this in Makefile.global.in?
> > (from commit e9c81b60 )
> > PROVE_FLAGS =
>
> Before that commit it was like
>
> PROVE_FLAGS = --verbose
right.
> which had some value. I agree that now we'd be better off to not
> set it at all, especially since the convention now appears to be that
> automatically-supplied prove options should be set in PG_PROVE_FLAGS.
Good point.
> I'd suggest that the comment just above be replaced by something like
>
> # User-supplied prove flags can be provided in PROVE_FLAGS.
Works for me.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-05-04 05:28:26 | Re: WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-04 04:21:38 | Re: GCC 7 warnings |