| From: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy |
| Date: | 2003-03-24 14:52:41 |
| Message-ID: | 86n0jk7r5y.fsf@red.stonehenge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I'm getting beaten up by the mysql users around me because they claim
that MySQL 4.x with InnoDB solves all of the ACID problems, so Pg no
longer pulls clearly ahead.
Has anyone examined this closely so that I have some nice things to
say about Pg instead?
Also, has anyone done a MySQL 4.x v Pg 7.{2,3}.x comparison recently?
All of the comparisons I saw in google were older.
Thanks.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> | 2003-03-24 15:08:17 | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy |
| Previous Message | lists | 2003-03-24 14:45:38 | plpgsql and setting array values. |