From: | "Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy |
Date: | 2003-03-24 15:08:17 |
Message-ID: | 200303242038.17585.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Monday 24 Mar 2003 8:22 pm, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> I'm getting beaten up by the mysql users around me because they claim
> that MySQL 4.x with InnoDB solves all of the ACID problems, so Pg no
> longer pulls clearly ahead.
>
> Has anyone examined this closely so that I have some nice things to
> say about Pg instead?
Yes.. Plenty of them..
* subselects in updates/deletes
* stored procedures
* stored procedures in different language
* ability to create different languages
* inheritance
* speed with transactions( Contrary to populer myth, mysql with transactions
is not at all faster than postgresql
* ability to survive large number of connections
* wealth of data types( Mysql has type to store network addresses?)
* ability to create user defined data types..
So on and so forth..
> Also, has anyone done a MySQL 4.x v Pg 7.{2,3}.x comparison recently?
> All of the comparisons I saw in google were older.
I suggest you do it if you have the setup. The community needs the results
anyway..
Shridhar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-03-24 15:18:39 | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for |
Previous Message | Randal L. Schwartz | 2003-03-24 14:52:41 | fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy |