Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy

From: "Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy
Date: 2003-03-24 15:08:17
Message-ID: 200303242038.17585.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Monday 24 Mar 2003 8:22 pm, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> I'm getting beaten up by the mysql users around me because they claim
> that MySQL 4.x with InnoDB solves all of the ACID problems, so Pg no
> longer pulls clearly ahead.
>
> Has anyone examined this closely so that I have some nice things to
> say about Pg instead?

Yes.. Plenty of them..

* subselects in updates/deletes
* stored procedures
* stored procedures in different language
* ability to create different languages
* inheritance
* speed with transactions( Contrary to populer myth, mysql with transactions
is not at all faster than postgresql
* ability to survive large number of connections
* wealth of data types( Mysql has type to store network addresses?)
* ability to create user defined data types..

So on and so forth..

> Also, has anyone done a MySQL 4.x v Pg 7.{2,3}.x comparison recently?
> All of the comparisons I saw in google were older.

I suggest you do it if you have the setup. The community needs the results
anyway..

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2003-03-24 15:18:39 Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
Previous Message Randal L. Schwartz 2003-03-24 14:52:41 fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy