Re: Hot standby documentation

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot standby documentation
Date: 2010-02-07 21:25:38
Message-ID: 86EA620E-D781-4F5C-8B18-065A1B3C9E0B@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 7, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:

>> I've always thought this feature was misnamed and nothing has happened
>> to change my mind, but it's not clear whether I'm in the majority.
>
> I'm afraid force of habit is more powerful than correctness on this one.
> It's going to be HS/SR whether that's perfectly correct or not.

What would be correct? I thought HS/SR were pretty correct (as long as no one confuses SR with synchronous replication!).

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-02-07 21:34:26 Re: damage control mode
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-02-07 21:03:41 Re: damage control mode