Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing)

From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih(at)kpnQwest(dot)no>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, matthew green <mrg(at)eterna(dot)com(dot)au>, ivan <ivan(at)420(dot)am>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing)
Date: 2001-04-14 21:24:55
Message-ID: 867l0n8994.fsf@athene.i.eunet.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> > I think this is indisputably a bug in (some versions of) NetBSD.
>
> I forgot to mention a possible contributing factor: the files involved
> were NFS-mounted, in the case I was looking at. So this may be an NFS
> problem more than a NetBSD problem. Anyone want to try the given test
> case on NFS-mounted files on other systems?

I can verify, that with NetBSD-current on sparc, your test code works
the way you want it to on local disk, but fails (in the way you've
observed), if the target file is on an NFS-mounted file system.

-tih
--
The basic difference is this: hackers build things, crackers break them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-04-14 23:09:43 Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing)
Previous Message Sergio A. Kessler 2001-04-14 20:21:30 alter database without shutting down !?