Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih(at)kpnQwest(dot)no>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, matthew green <mrg(at)eterna(dot)com(dot)au>, ivan <ivan(at)420(dot)am>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing)
Date: 2001-04-14 02:39:28
Message-ID: 12493.987215968@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I think this is indisputably a bug in (some versions of) NetBSD. If I
> can seek past the end of file, read() shouldn't consider it a hard error
> to read there --- and in any case, EFAULT isn't a very reasonable error
> code to return. Since it seems not to be a widespread problem, I'm not
> eager to change the hash code to try to avoid it.

I forgot to mention a possible contributing factor: the files involved
were NFS-mounted, in the case I was looking at. So this may be an NFS
problem more than a NetBSD problem. Anyone want to try the given test
case on NFS-mounted files on other systems?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-04-14 02:56:18 7.1-1 RPMset uploading...
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-04-14 02:22:50 Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs