Re: Testing FusionIO

From: Justin Pitts <justinpitts(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
Date: 2010-03-17 13:11:15
Message-ID: 86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:

> I've been hearing bad things from some folks about the quality of the
> FusionIO drives from a durability standpoint.

Can you be more specific about that? Durability over what time frame? How many devices in the sample set? How did FusionIO deal with the issue?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brad Nicholson 2010-03-17 13:18:20 Re: Testing FusionIO
Previous Message Brad Nicholson 2010-03-17 13:03:28 Re: Testing FusionIO