| From: | Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pitts <justinpitts(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Testing FusionIO |
| Date: | 2010-03-17 13:18:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1268831900.4412.1739.camel@bnicholson-desktop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:11 -0400, Justin Pitts wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:
>
> > I've been hearing bad things from some folks about the quality of the
> > FusionIO drives from a durability standpoint.
>
> Can you be more specific about that? Durability over what time frame? How many devices in the sample set? How did FusionIO deal with the issue?
I didn't get any specifics - as we are looking at other products. It
did center around how FusionIO did wear-leveling though.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pitts | 2010-03-17 13:52:26 | Re: Testing FusionIO |
| Previous Message | Justin Pitts | 2010-03-17 13:11:15 | Re: Testing FusionIO |