| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
| Date: | 2021-12-16 05:02:54 |
| Message-ID: | 864392.1639630974@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> I think you missed a few parts though ?
Um. I think those are leftover from when I was intending the
cutoff to be 9.0 not 9.2. I'll take a fresh look tomorrow.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-12-16 05:06:34 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-12-16 04:58:04 | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |