| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 23:19:45 |
| Message-ID: | 8641.1212103185@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The RPM packages have done this since approximately forever. You might
>> want to look at the patches used there.
> yes [1] is the same that we have been using internally.
> Let me reformulate my question: would it be better to include something
> like the attached patch in PostgreSQL, than have every distributor of
> the tests apply it?
> [1]
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/postgresql/F-9/postgresql-test.patch?rev=1.3&view=auto
I never particularly thought it would be useful to push that patch
upstream, but certainly it would make life a tad simpler for Devrim and
me. Since nobody else has objected, I'll look into doing this in HEAD.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-30 00:14:30 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-29 23:12:22 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |